Government Workers Profiting From Manhatred

It was good to see the Times publishing an article by Rod Liddle that exposes the truth behind the reasons for women failing to reach parity with men in the higher echelons of business - an article that was drawn to my attention by Darren's CoolTools4Men.

Watch out ladies — the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) is after you. According to this organisation’s latest fatuous annual survey, paid for by you and me, some 6,000 women are missing from Britain’s boardrooms.

The sole reason for this, according to the EOC, is simple: discrimination; discrimination against women by men.

... [But] It has not remotely occurred to them that there might be any other cause, such as a comparatively smaller proportion of women who wish to become company directors, MPs, councillors and the like. Or, indeed, that a smaller proportion of women may possess the abilities to do these awful jobs.

But, of course, Rod Liddle is wrong.

The notion that the EOC is not aware of the fact that women are less committed than men to the workpace is risible.

Indeed, there is surely no longer any realistic doubt in the minds of most intelligent people that women are bound to do less well than men in the workplace because, quite simply, they are less committed to the workplace. And those working at the EOC are undoubtedly aware of this. Indeed, it is inconceivable that they are not aware of the fact that the aspirations of women must have at least something to do with it all.

But why does the EOC not mention this?

Why does the EOC not point out that women, themselves, are at least partly responsible for the fact that they achieve less than men in the workplace? Why must they pin all the blame on men?

Well, the answer to this question must be that the staff at the EOC are purposely trying to fuel hatred toward men in order to further their agenda. There is no other realistic explanation for their dishonesty.

Furthermore, as we know, the stirring up of hatred towards men is the very essence of feminism - an ideology that thrives ONLY by the continual demonisation of men; e.g see Some BBC Propaganda Tricks.

Certainly, in comparison to the amount of hatred towards men purposely fuelled by various other feminist-controlled bodies and, of course, by the 'abuse industry' itself, this dishonesty by the EOC might seem comparatively trivial, but the effects of it, nevertheless, spread way beyond polite discussions about the progress of women in the workplace. For example, the very idea that men throughout the workplace are busily discriminating against women makes women throughout the land feel completely justified in doing their best to undermine men in many other circumstances, and it raises the hostility that, in general, they feel towards men.

And so what we see here is a very good example of a government agency (organism) profiting itself - justifying its existence, providing jobs for its staff, furthering the feminist cause - by demonising men. Furthermore, not only is this demonisation quite unjustifiable, the negative ramifications of it spread far beyond any academic discussion.

As such, I have no hesitation at all in describing the staff at the EOC as nothing more than pernicious parasites; that is, people who profit by damaging others and by damaging their very own societies.

In my view, these people not only waste the money and resources that we expend on them, they actually inflict a huge amount of damage on us all.

And I have no respect for these people at all. And neither should you!

Indeed, how would you feel about a group of people who went around smashing cars, breaking the windows of houses, throwing rubbish everywhere and, in general, damaging the environment in which you lived?

Why feel any different about those who purposely set out to do the very same to all our relationships?

...